Six Key Year-End Financial Moves for 2025

I swear the calendar speeds up after Halloween. One minute you’re handing out candy, the next you’re wondering how Thanksgiving came and went so fast. And then, like clockwork, people start getting that nagging feeling that there might be some financial housekeeping they should take care of before the year wraps up. They may not know exactly what those things are yet, but the instinct is there. 

So let’s talk through the six big moves we should pay attention to this time of year, with enough time to actually make a difference before December 31st. In fact, we’re going to avoid most of the technicalities and specific strategies in this piece, and instead just drive the point home that you can’t ignore these things. Just give them a little attention before the year closes and your future self will be very pleased with you. And your future self is someone you definitely want on your side!

1. Maxing out retirement contributions

If you have access to tax advantaged retirement accounts, this is where I like to start before December 31. I mean workplace plans such as 401(k), 403b or most 457b plans, individual IRAs and HSAs if you are eligible.

There are three main consequences if you routinely come in well below what you reasonably could contribute.

First, you may be paying more current year tax than necessary, because dollars that could have gone into a pre tax 401(k) or HSA are sitting in a taxable account or just flowing through your checking account. That can mean higher income tax today, without any extra long term benefit.

Key retirement contribution limits for tax year 2025
Account type 2025 limit under 50 2025 limit 50 plus
401k, 403b, most 457b employee salary deferral $23,500 $31,000 including $7,500 catch up
Traditional or Roth IRA total annual contribution $7,000 $8,000 including $1,000 catch up
HSA self only coverage $4,300 $5,300 including $1,000 catch up at 55 plus
HSA family coverage $8,550 $9,550 including $1,000 catch up at 55 plus
Limits shown are general federal limits for 2025 and may be subject to additional rules based on income, plan design, and eligibility. This table is for informational purposes only and is not individualized tax advice.

Second, you’re shrinking the base that compounds for you inside the account. When you underfund a tax advantaged account year after year, it is not just that one year that is smaller. Every future year starts from a lower base. 

Third, if your workplace plan offers a match and your contribution rate is low enough that you are not capturing the full match, that is compensation you simply didn’t take. The market can go up or down. The match is the rare place where the math is very lopsided in your favor.

Compound Growth Comparison

The Compound Cost of Underfunding

Growth using actual 401(k) contribution limits from 2005-2025 at 10% annual return

$0 $300k $600k $900k $1.2M 0 5 10 15 20 Years $1,190,287 $1,071,258
Full Funding (100% of limit each year)
90% Funding (90% of limit each year)
Difference after 20 years: $119,029
This illustration is hypothetical and for educational purposes only. It assumes annual contributions matching the IRS 401(k) elective deferral limits from 2005-2025 (ranging from $14,000 to $23,500) for full funding, or 90% of those limits for the underfunding scenario. Contributions are assumed to be made at the beginning of each year with a 10% annual rate of return compounded annually. Actual investment returns will vary and cannot be guaranteed. This example does not represent any specific investment and does not account for taxes, fees, employer matching contributions, or inflation. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Your actual results may be higher or lower depending on contribution amounts, timing, returns, fees, and market conditions.

I’m not saying everyone should squeeze every last dollar into every account, no matter what. Cash flow, debt, upcoming expenses, risk tolerance, all of that matters. What I am saying is that before the year ends, it is worth looking at your actual contribution percentages and asking a simple question: given my income and budget this year, am I taking full advantage of the retirement accounts available to me, or am I leaving long term benefits on the table?

2. Tax-loss harvesting

This is the part that feels a bit like a magic trick. Except it’s not magic, it’s just the tax code written in a way that occasionally gives you a perk when your investments have a bad run. Tax-loss harvesting is the process of realizing capital losses to offset gains. You sell an investment that’s down, recognize the loss, and then reinvest in something similar (not identical, or the IRS will have a word with you because of wash-sale rules).

Tax-Loss Harvesting Impact

Tax-Loss Harvesting in Action

How realizing losses can reduce your tax bill

Without Tax-Loss Harvesting

Capital Gains Realized $75,000
Capital Losses Harvested $0
Net Capital Gains $75,000
Tax Rate: 15% Federal Long-Term Capital Gains
Your Tax Bill
$11,250

With Tax-Loss Harvesting

Capital Gains Realized $75,000
Capital Losses Harvested -$40,000
Net Capital Gains $35,000
Tax Rate: 15% Federal Long-Term Capital Gains
Your Tax Bill
$5,250
Tax Savings This Year
$6,000
Plus, you remain invested in the market with similar exposure
This is a hypothetical example for educational purposes only. Actual tax savings will depend on your individual tax situation, including your capital gains tax rate and total gains and losses for the year. This example assumes long-term capital gains taxed at 15% federal rate and does not account for state taxes, net investment income tax, or other tax considerations. Tax-loss harvesting involves specific IRS rules including wash-sale provisions. Consult with a tax professional before implementing tax-loss harvesting strategies. This is not tax advice.

This isn’t “let’s hope for losses so we can harvest them.” No one wants losses, and we certainly shouldn’t hope for them! But if the market gave you a lemon this year, the loss can offset capital gains and even reduce up to three thousand dollars of ordinary income in a given year. And unused losses can carry forward. For people with large taxable accounts, this is one of those subtle levers that can save real money over long periods.

The rules are precise, so this is one you generally don’t want to improvise on your own.

3. Roth conversion analysis

This is the move that sounds simple from the outside but hides a surprising number of gears. Should you convert something to Roth before December ends? The only honest first answer is “maybe.”

A Roth conversion means taking money from a pre-tax account like a traditional IRA and moving it into a Roth IRA. The catch is that the amount you convert becomes taxable income this year. You pay tax now so that the future growth is tax-free. That can be powerful, especially when tax rates are relatively low or when you expect higher income in future years.

Where it gets interesting is in the analysis. Tax brackets. Medicare premiums. Social Security taxation. Phase-outs for deductions or credits. Required Minimum Distributions later in life. Future tax law changes. Market conditions. Every conversion is a puzzle. Interesting at times, frustrating at others, but always a puzzle worth solving!

Roth Conversion Sweet Spot – 2025

Finding Your Roth Conversion Sweet Spot

See how far you can convert in 2025 before your income moves into a higher tax bracket.

Example Scenario
Married couple filing jointly with $150,000 in taxable income in 2025. Their income currently falls in the 22% federal tax bracket, and they are considering how much to convert from a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA this year.
37% $751,601+
35% $501,051 – $751,600
32% $394,601 – $501,050
24% $206,701 – $394,600
⚠️
Converting more than $56,700 pushes a portion of the conversion into the 24% bracket, where each extra dollar is taxed 24% instead of 22%.
Current taxable income: $150,000
22% $96,951 – $206,700
Sweet Spot
Convert up to $56,700
Uses all remaining room in the 22% bracket before hitting 24%.
12% $23,851 – $96,950
10% $0 – $23,850

Strategic Conversion

Convert $56,700
All of the conversion stays in the 22% bracket.
Estimated Tax Cost: ~$12,474
Fills the 22% bracket without triggering 24% on any of the conversion.

Aggressive Conversion

Convert $100,000
First $56,700 taxed at 22%, remaining $43,300 taxed at 24%.
Estimated Tax Cost: ~$22,866
Higher up-front tax bill because more of the conversion lands in the 24% bracket.
The idea: For this couple in 2025, the Roth conversion “sweet spot” is the $56,700 of room they have left in the 22% bracket. Converting more than that still may be smart long term, but those extra dollars are taxed at 24% instead of 22%, which increases the immediate tax cost on that part of the conversion.
This is a hypothetical example for educational purposes only, based on 2025 federal income tax brackets for married couples filing jointly. Bracket thresholds are rounded for readability. Actual tax brackets, income thresholds, and optimal conversion amounts will vary based on your specific situation, filing status, state taxes, and other income considerations. Roth conversions may also affect Medicare premiums, Social Security taxation, and eligibility for various tax credits and deductions. The tax cost calculation is simplified and does not account for deductions, credits, or other tax planning strategies. Consult with a tax professional to determine the optimal conversion strategy for your circumstances. This is not tax advice.

Sometimes people assume Roth conversions are only useful for high earners or only useful for younger people. They’re useful whenever the math works, and the math changes year to year. When markets are down, conversions become more attractive. When someone has a weirdly low-income year, it becomes attractive. When you’re edging into a higher bracket but not quite there, it becomes attractive. When RMDs loom in your seventies, it becomes attractive to shrink that future liability.

That’s why we should run these calculations fresh every year. December is a good time for it because we know what the year looked like. We know the projected income. We know the portfolio values. And if it makes sense, the conversion has to be done by December 31. 

4. Charitable giving strategies

This is the time of year when charitable impulses and tax strategies overlap. And while I’m never going to suggest doing good only for a tax deduction, if you’re already planning to give, you might as well do it in the smartest way available.

One approach is called bunching. It means grouping several years’ worth of charitable gifts into a single tax year so that you exceed the standard deduction and itemize. Then the following years you take the standard deduction again. This works especially well when someone wants to make gifts eventually but doesn’t need the tax break every single year.

Charitable Bunching Strategy

Charitable Bunching: Give Smarter, Save More

How concentrating donations in one year can increase your tax benefit

Example Scenario
Married couple planning to donate $10,000 annually to charity over 3 years

Without Bunching

Traditional Annual Giving
Year 1
Charitable Giving $10,000
Standard deduction ($29,200) is higher
Deduction: $29,200
Year 2
Charitable Giving $10,000
Standard deduction ($29,200) is higher
Deduction: $29,200
Year 3
Charitable Giving $10,000
Standard deduction ($29,200) is higher
Deduction: $29,200
Total Charitable Giving $30,000
Total Tax Deductions $87,600
No additional tax benefit from charitable giving

With Bunching

Strategic Concentrated Giving
Year 1
Charitable Giving $30,000
Exceeds standard deduction!
Deduction: $30,000
Year 2
Charitable Giving $0
Take standard deduction
Deduction: $29,200
Year 3
Charitable Giving $0
Take standard deduction
Deduction: $29,200
Total Charitable Giving $30,000
Total Tax Deductions $88,400
$800 in additional deductions captured
Additional Tax Deductions
$800
$88,400 - $87,600 = $800 more in deductions
Tax Savings: $192 (assumes 24% tax bracket)
Same total giving, more tax benefit. Use a donor-advised fund to contribute all $30,000 in Year 1, then distribute to charities over time.
This is a hypothetical example for educational purposes only using 2024 standard deduction amounts for married filing jointly ($29,200). For simplicity, this example does not include other itemizable deductions such as state and local taxes, mortgage interest, or medical expenses. In practice, bunching becomes even more beneficial when combined with other itemizable deductions. Actual tax benefits will depend on your specific tax situation, filing status, income level, state taxes, and total itemizable deductions. The example assumes a 24% marginal tax rate. Charitable giving strategies should align with your philanthropic goals, not just tax benefits. Donor-advised funds have their own rules and requirements. Contributions must be complete by December 31 to count for the current tax year. Consult with a tax professional to determine if bunching or other charitable giving strategies are appropriate for your situation. This is not tax advice.

Another approach is using a donor-advised fund. It lets you make a charitable contribution now, take the deduction now, and then distribute the money to charities over time. You can invest the assets in the fund while you decide. Think of it like setting up your own little charitable reservoir. This is especially useful in high-income years or in years when investment gains create a higher tax bill that you want to offset.

And then there’s gifting appreciated securities. Instead of selling an investment with a gain and paying tax, you donate the security directly and the charity receives the full value. As a bonus, you avoid the tax on the appreciation.

The only rule that matters for this article is that the gift must be complete by December 31 for it to count. Checks need to be mailed and shares need to be transferred by then. The clock is ticking!

5. Required Minimum Distributions

Now we get into an area that causes more confusion than almost anything else I deal with in December. RMDs. The government requires withdrawals from certain retirement accounts once you hit age 73. They don’t ask. They tell. And if you miss the deadline, the penalty used to be so painful that clients would turn pale just hearing it. Thankfully the penalty is lower now, but it’s still something you do not want to play around with.

The rule applies to traditional IRAs, SEP IRAs, SIMPLE IRAs, and most workplace retirement plans. Roth IRAs and 401(k)s are not subject to RMDs during the owner’s lifetime. The calculation is based on account balances on December 31 of the previous year, and the withdrawal must be taken by December 31 of the current year. The exception is the first RMD, which can be delayed until April 1 of the following year. But for most people, delaying that first one just means doubling up next year.

Required Minimum Distributions

Required Minimum Distributions: The Unavoidable Tax Bill

How RMDs force withdrawals and increase over time

Example Scenario
Retiree with $500,000 Traditional IRA balance at age 73

Your RMD Requirement Grows Each Year

Age 73
$18,519
Age 75
$21,008
Age 80
$27,933
Age 85
$37,879
Age 90
$53,191
Each year you must withdraw an increasing percentage of your account balance, whether you need the money or not.
This is a hypothetical example for visual purposes only. RMD calculations are based on IRS Uniform Lifetime Table for a single individual. Actual RMD amounts depend on your account balance as of December 31 of the previous year, your age, and your beneficiary status. The example assumes a constant $500,000 balance for illustration purposes, though actual balances will fluctuate with market performance and withdrawals. RMD rules apply to Traditional IRAs, SEP IRAs, SIMPLE IRAs, and most employer-sponsored retirement plans including 401(k), 403(b), and 457(b) plans. Roth IRAs are not subject to RMDs during the owner's lifetime. Consult with a tax professional for your specific RMD requirements and planning strategies. This is not tax advice.

RMDs actually serve a (not in your favor) purpose; they prevent pre-tax accounts from growing tax-free forever. But with good planning, they can be integrated into a broader income strategy that reduces surprises.

Sometimes the smart move is to take the RMD early in the year. Sometimes it’s taking it in December. Sometimes it’s converting part of the account before you even reach RMD age to keep future RMDs manageable. But the main thing is hitting the deadline.

6. Reviewing beneficiary designations

This is the item that can actually have the biggest consequences. Every year I remind people to review their beneficiary designations because life changes. Marriages. Divorces. Children. Grandchildren. People fall out of touch. People pass away. And yet the forms sit unchanged.

Beneficiary designations override your will. If you wrote a big, beautiful will drafted by the best estate attorney in the county but never updated the beneficiaries on your retirement accounts, the account goes to whoever is listed. Even if you meant to change it. Even if your family knows what you would have wanted. The form always wins!

Imagine remarrying, and years later, you fully intend for your current spouse to inherit a retirement account, but you’ve never updated the old form. When you pass, the account legally goes straight to your ex spouse from twenty years ago. The institution simply follows the form on file, because that’s what the law requires.

Beneficiary Designation Checklist

Your Annual Beneficiary Designation Checklist

Five minutes now can prevent years of unintended consequences

Accounts to Review

Check beneficiary designations on all of these accounts

401(k) / 403(b)
Employer retirement plans
Traditional & Roth IRAs
Individual retirement accounts
Life Insurance
All policies you own
Brokerage Accounts
Taxable investment accounts
Annuities
Fixed and variable contracts
Bank Accounts (POD)
Payable on death designations
HSA / FSA
Health savings accounts
Pension Plans
Defined benefit plans
This checklist is for educational purposes only and is not a comprehensive list of all accounts or situations that may require beneficiary designations. Beneficiary designation rules vary by account type and institution. Some accounts may have restrictions on who can be named as a beneficiary. State laws regarding beneficiary designations, particularly for married individuals, vary significantly. In community property states, spousal consent may be required to name a non-spouse beneficiary. Estate planning should be coordinated with your overall financial plan, will, and trust documents. Consult with an estate planning attorney and financial advisor to ensure your beneficiary designations align with your overall estate plan. This is not legal or estate planning advice.

So every December, look at your accounts just to make sure nothing surprising happened in the last twelve months. Not because you expect accidental mischief, but because oversight is easy, and this is one of the easiest fixes in all of financial planning. Five minutes of checking can prevent years of unintended consequences.

In Conclusion

When I look at all six of these year-end moves in one sweep, they don’t look dramatic. They don’t feel like the kind of things that get splashy headlines. But this is the core of what good planning looks like, a willingness to spend a little time each year tidying the corners before the calendar flips.

I get  it. The end of the year is noisy, with holidays, family, work deadlines, and travel all bearing down on you like a freight train. But your financial life doesn’t care much about the noise of that freight train approaching. The rules stay the rules, the deadlines stay the deadlines, which makes this the perfect moment to give your future self a gift. A calm, organized, well-tuned financial transition into the new year.

If you want to walk through your situation and see which of these moves matter most for you this year, we’re here. This is what we do, and we genuinely enjoy helping people put the pieces together.

Click the button below and we’ll talk it through.

The information contained in this article is for educational purposes only, this is not intended as tax, legal, or financial advice. One should always consult with the tax, legal, and financial professionals of their choosing regarding their specific situation.
Wealth Management Form